In Book VI of the Republic, while debating with
Glaucon on the type of man who should govern the city, Socrates makes a simple
statement:
"...a man who does not understand how justice and honor are related to the good won't guard them very effectively."
I completely agree with this assumption. If a ruler does not know how
justice and honor correlate to what is good then they cannot truly understand
what "the good" is, and without that understanding they will never be
able to lead their people to the ultimate city that Socrates is defending. If a ruler does not have an understanding of
justice, the city will become corrupt. If a ruler does not understand honor
then he himself will become corrupt. Without these two founding principles a
ruler can never know what is good, and therefore cannot defend it or the
principles that amount to it.
p.s-I commmented on Danielle's "The Cave and The Great Divorce"
ReplyDelete