I read the
Ring of Gyges last semester in Intro to Philosophy, but I really enjoyed
reading it again this semester. However, it still frustrates me. A lot of Book
2 is filled with arguments defending injustice and how enjoyable it is. One
specific quote that highlights this distinctly is in section 364d:
“Vice in abundance is
easy to choose,
The road is smooth and
it lies very near,
While the gods have
set sweat before virtue,
And it is a long road,
rough and steep.”
When I read
this quote I stopped and put the book down. It’s so true, and that’s why it
frustrates me. The world we live in disregards injustice because doing wrong is
so much more beneficial and entertaining than doing good or being just. One who
desires to truly be just cannot decide on a whim to pursue justice because, in
truth, the road is hard. What else could be expected in an unjust world? Justice
won’t ever be held in high esteem when it’s impractical and unproductive by
society’s standards. God is just. As a follower of Christ we know that our road
will be hard: “Whoever wants to be my disciple must deny themselves and take up
their cross daily and follow me.” Luke 9:23
Back to the
question Mashburn asked in class… if there were no consequences would you steal
a million dollars? A just person, I believe, would have to answer no, because
there are always consequences. Even if you might not be punished for stealing
the money, your actions will affect others. Because of this you must do what is
right, and that means upholding justice even if no one else ever knows.
That’s one
of the many thoughts that Plato has left running through my head.
P.S.
commented on Rebekah’s “Health to the Soul”
I agree with you about the fact that even if there are no consequences, everything you do still effects someone. If people steal from a company and nothing happens they will continue to steal. Eventually the company will close and you can not steal from them. So in the long run it also effects you.
ReplyDelete